Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02213
Original file (BC 2013 02213.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	   DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02213
			   COUNSEL: NONE
		 	   HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her former husband’s (decedent) records be corrected to show he 
made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the 
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The decedent had a letter stating he continued to pay for SBP 
because he wanted her to receive it.

In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, copies of the decedent’s Retiree Account Statement, 
death certificate, and the decedent’s memorandum to DFAS.

Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force.  Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in 
this Record of Proceedings.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval.  DPFFF states that although the 
member failed to submit an election to establish former spouse 
coverage, he did not request the applicant's coverage be 
terminated.  His willingness to accept a reduction in his 
retired pay for over nine years after his divorce is indicative 
of his intention to maintain the applicant as the eligible SBP 
beneficiary.  There is no evidence of Air Force error in this 
case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the 
member's record be corrected to reflect on 6 May 1999, he 
elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on 
the previous reduced level of retired pay, naming the applicant 
as the former spouse beneficiary.  Approval should be 
contingent upon recovery of any applicable premiums.

The complete DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 24 Jul 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  To 
date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C).

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  After a 
thorough review of the facts and circumstances of this case, we 
agree with AFPC/DPFFF’s recommendation that the member’s records 
should be corrected to reflect that he made a valid election for 
former spouse coverage, based on a reduced level of retired pay 
effective 6 May 1999.  Therefore, we recommend the member’s 
records be corrected as set forth below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to MEMBER, be corrected to show that on 6 May 
1999, he elected former spouse coverage under the Survivor 
Benefit Plan, based on a reduced level of retired pay naming his 
former spouse as the former spouse beneficiary.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 5 Feb 2014, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

      , Panel Chair 
      , Member
      , Member


All members voted to correct the record as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2013-
02213:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 May 2013, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPFFF, dated 1 Jul 2013.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jul 2013.




								
								Panel Chair







Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03731

    Original file (BC 2013 03731.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The decedent elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay prior to his 1 Jul 95 retirement. There is no evidence either party submitted a valid election to change spouse to former spouse coverage within the first year following their divorce as the law requires. The complete DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit F. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant acknowledges the change to the advisory opinion to recommend the decedent’s record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03921

    Original file (BC 2013 03921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends granting relief. The parties divorced on 2 Dec 04, and in the Agreement, incorporated in the divorce decree, the decedent agreed to pay SBP premiums currently in place for the benefit of the applicant. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON JUL 2 2 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Docket Number: BC-2013-03921 I have carefully reviewed the AFBMCR application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05614

    Original file (BC 2013 05614.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect that on 1 Jul 87, he elected to change RCSBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the eligible beneficiary. SBP premiums were deducted from the decedent’s retired pay until his 28 Jun 11 death. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00195

    Original file (BC 2014 00195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In a two-page brief, through counsel, the applicant contends the following: Her former spouse intended for her to be the SBP beneficiary from the date of their divorce on 18 May 99, to the date of his death. The Board should consider her untimely application in the interest of justice because she did not discover the error until after the death of her former spouse. There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, we recommend...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02594

    Original file (BC 2013 02594.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    According to their divorce decree, the decedent agreed to maintain the applicant as the SBP beneficiary. DPFFF recommends the member’s record be corrected to reflect on 13 Sep 2002, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00167

    Original file (BC 2014 00167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00167 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated as the former spouse beneficiary under the Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect that on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04626

    Original file (BC-2012-04626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval, stating, in part, there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent's record be corrected to reflect on 1 Feb 94, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. Considering the applicant failed to execute a deemed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00704

    Original file (BC 2014 00704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submitted DD Form 1882, for former spouse and child coverage; however, DFAS-CL did not honor the election because it was not received until after the one-year eligibility period. However, while the applicant contends the election for former spouse coverage was made within the required time, no evidence has been provided, to our satisfaction, that she or the deceased former member submitted a valid former spouse election during the first year following their divorce. THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00338

    Original file (BC 2014 00338.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00338 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated as the former spouse beneficiary under the Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). Second, we note that the divorce decree submitted by the applicant was not final, as it was not executed by both parties and the court. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04233

    Original file (BC-2012-04233.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She recently discovered that upon their divorce, her ex- husband failed to change the SBP election designation from “spouse” to “former spouse” as was required by their divorce agreement. Based on the favorable recommendation rendered by the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicating that since the member did not request SBP coverage be terminated upon his divorce from the applicant, he intended for her to remain his SBP beneficiary. ...